My Chef Food Processor

Facts & Figures - voters

in almost everything today is so available, so the number of eligible voters in the last municipal election.

official results: http://www.wahlen.rlp.de/kw/index.html

is there to read it, too, that take place almost every month in elections in some communities, why you have it with us in such a hurry with the mayoral election. young enough to be scheduled next year in January. so that we would come off in the communities with a better-go.

I call this mayor anyway only "figurehead of the Titanic"

now pay to the:

voter Local Elections 2009
VG Treis-carding
		Eifel Mosel Hunsrück
Binningen	579
Brieden	111
Brohl	325
Dünfus	246
Forestry	328
Kail	249
Lahr		150
Lie		341
Lütz		262
Möntenich	115
Mörsdorf		572
Moselkern			515
weary			575
Pommern			408
Roes	433
Treis-Karden			1937
Zilshausen		259
Gesamt	2386	1584	3435

pay

I needed for my letter to the editor at 12/01/2011 (read under the headline: Mr. Young wants the referendum) - here are the individual values so that they look that bad to-follow total number is explained.

would now opt for a Lütz Mosel-vg, which I can understand, we would be further reduced in the Hunsrück voting weight and the overall numbers would look like this:

total ;

2386

1322

3697

vote up to 11 communities would then have the Moselle, the absolute majority (if all would go to the polls we opted for their region).

do the Mosel towns its administrative headquarters in the Eifel Hunsrück or in?

I think not.

the consequence would mean a referendum, then, that all of the mountain runtermüßten to the Moselle.

oh oh, then beka mr young, too Nix on the article 5 of the KVR Act, if no one could move to Kaisersesch. well, as he has, however, charged that the whole carding treis vg-net he gets.
but he should be content with the eifel communities and is well. bissi modesty has never been harmful.

me now is it clear why men's cord is so strong for the whole shift. because its like too ne referendum may not. and he even has the law on his side - But if it were morally right?

Does Your Cervic Swell Before Menstration

Mr. Young wants the referendum

... once in an exciting in the newspaper, local part Cochem, 10/01/2011:

no link to read oneself

keeps young lord in the new year so to speak, receiving his farewell speech.

he praises his performance in solidarity wind power economic consensus of the Mayor on topic. would prosecute this solidarity but in all the vg, then we would be today may not be so rebellious and would probably not want to go their own way.

but that was actually not my aufregerthema.

times I quote from the newspaper hope (, I may, if not, tell me please):

Title:

citizens are to decide on municipal reform.

Resume block right in the report:

"The citizens must decide for yourself, otherwise there is a riot."

The outgoing chief Albert VG-Jung calls for a referendum in terms of the merger partner for Treis-carded.

text excerpts from the report:

yet calm prevailed, but that could change, said the mayor spoke, also in view of the protests in Stuttgart, for a Referendum on a merger of the VG Treis-carded with other member municipalities. "The citizens themselves have to determine, otherwise there is a revolt," warned young. The will of the citizens to be admitted, he insisted.

** End quote **

So, I find it quite brazenly, to keep us for so stupid that we recognize the hypocrisy behind it. so I had to once again write a letter to the editor. today he was somewhat edited, published.

here I copy out my version in, the content is the same as in the expression of the newspaper is part of something more pleasing:

Mr Young argued in his farewell speech at the New Year reception in Treis-carded for a referendum, while the VG is to merge Treis-carded. He is simply, the Lord Jung - its audience. Mr. Young still wants to leave the entire VG merge Treis-carded, with whoever. This matters to the current controversy over completely.

Let's look at the construct of VG Treis-carded but at times:
Source: Official election results for the association council elections in 2009 http://www.wahlen.rlp.de/
The shifts for the election in 2011 are marginal.

In the VG Treis-carding divides the number of Total eligible voters in fellow citizens in the communities

Eifel 2386
Mosel Hunsrück local communities
3435 1584

If you want to vote now by referendum where the VG is to merge Treis-carded, the Hunsrück communities are in the minority and we do with a political shrug. The people have decided, but you're outvoted

In the newspaper report is not that the will of individual communities or topographical areas should be considered. If I have correctly interpreted the policy suggestion is still to move only the entire VG.

If the referendum is such that a community-based says decision to be moved where, the Hunsrück also have the opportunity to make "moving to Kastellaun" a cross and the VG-Council which then also agrees with, it should Hunsrück us be quite - because that would be based on democracy and not us citizens are not employable desperately clinging to the current heterogeneous structure.